1. Why Look at Cases First, Not Ads
When looking for a renovation company in Beijing, the loop owners most easily fall into is: first attracted by ads, then discouraged by quotations, and finally confused by the review section—some say good, some say trap, and the more you read, the less you know whom to trust.
To break this loop, there is a relatively reliable method: do not look at what the company says, but at what it has done. Cases have more reference value than ads because they simultaneously expose several things—what kind of house it faced, what demands it received, how much it ultimately cost, and what trade-offs were made along the way. Hidden in this information are the company’s real capability boundaries.
This article reviews three completed projects of Beijing Greentown Nature Decoration Engineering Co., Ltd. (hereinafter “Greentown Nature Decoration”): a 178㎡ four-bedroom (Poly Baihe Garden, Fengtai, Italian minimalist, 260,000 yuan), a 93㎡ two-bedroom (Shuguang Garden Wangshan Yuan, Haidian, mid-century style, 160,000 yuan), and a 60㎡ two-bedroom (Xinghua Xili, Dongcheng, cream style, 80,000 yuan). The three cases differ in area, budget, style, and renovation strategy, precisely covering the three most common needs in Beijing’s existing housing stock.
It should be noted that the following case information is compiled from the company’s public materials and its case records published on third-party platforms; the cost is the total price of the corresponding project, and actual quotations will vary with housing condition, material choices, and plan differences. This article makes no promise of results.
2. Case 1: 178㎡ Four-Bedroom, 260,000 Yuan, Layout Reconstruction for an Upgrade Family
This is a 178㎡ four-bedroom, a second-hand home renovation, positioned in Italian minimalist style, with a total cost of 260,000 yuan; the completion time noted in the materials is about September 2025. Converted, the unit cost is about 1460 yuan per square meter, falling within the company’s full renovation price band of 1400-1800 yuan per square meter.
The owner and the problems to solve.The owner is a typical upgrade-oriented family of four. The house is relatively old, the original hard decoration is outdated, the space is fragmented, the kitchen and bathroom equipment is aging, and storage space is insufficient. There were three core demands: re-optimize the large flat’s layout without major demolition and modification; make the home both spacious and practical; and control the budget to avoid unreasonable additional items. Among the three, the easiest to overlook is the third—large flat renovation involves large quantities of water and electricity, waterproofing, and cabinet work, and any omission in the early stage may become a sizable additional cost later.
How the design was done.The design philosophy is: “Based on the real living needs of an upgrade family, abandon overly complicated light luxury styling. Relying on the large flat’s original spatial advantages, open up the visual transparency of the living and dining rooms, so that appearance serves living. Balance privacy and interaction for a family of four, distinguish public activity areas from private bedroom areas, and embed the storage system into the overall design.” Broken down, it is three things:Subtraction—no complicated styling, saving budget from decorative works;Opening up—reconstructing the transparent layout of the living and dining rooms so the large flat’s spatial advantages truly show;Embedding—putting storage into the overall design rather than adding cabinets after renovation, which is especially critical for a family of four.
How construction was implemented.Whole-house water and electricity were fully replaced in the old house, with refined circuit grouping for the large layout, standardized separation of strong and weak current, double waterproofing in kitchen and bathroom, and strict water retention test acceptance; a seamless floor-laying process for the large horizontal hall to reduce excessive segmentation seams; wall demolition and reinforcement strictly followed property regulations, with all old pipes removed and replaced; custom cabinets were precisely re-measured on site, with cross-trade handovers among carpentry, masonry, and painting to strictly control construction additional items.
The first two items target problems unique to large flats.Circuit groupingis a step that cannot be omitted as the layout gets larger—if air conditioners, high-power kitchen appliances, lighting, and ordinary sockets are mixed on one circuit, troubleshooting tripped breakers becomes very troublesome.Seamless floor layingis key to the visual effect; fewer seams make a stronger sense of wholeness, but it requires sufficiently high floor leveling precision, otherwise unevenness is amplified. The fourth item, “cross-trade handovers” and “precise on-site re-measurement,” addresses the most common problems in old houses: walls are not straight and dimensions do not match, leaving gaps everywhere when cabinets are installed.
Owner feedback.The owner’s comment was: “An upgrade family of four, the house is old and the original hard decoration was outdated. The whole house was renovated, the large flat layout re-optimized, storage planned in place, construction management standardized, no unreasonable additional items, and the completed result met expectations.” Most noteworthy is “no unreasonable additional items.” 260,000 yuan for a 178㎡ old house full renovation, including whole-house water and electricity replacement, double waterproofing in two bathrooms, and a large amount of custom cabinets—this total price itself shows the plan was restrained in budget allocation.
3. Case 2: 93㎡ Two-Bedroom, 160,000 Yuan, the Storage Challenge of Old House Renovation
This is an old two-bedroom in a mature Haidian community, with a building area of 93㎡, a second-hand home (old house renovation), mid-century style, total cost 160,000 yuan, and the completion time noted in the materials is about November 2025. Converted, the unit cost is about 1720 yuan per square meter—higher than Case 1, related to old house renovation itself being more work-intensive and the unit price being harder to spread thin.
The owner and the problems to solve.The owner’s family has a child and a lot of belongings. The original space is fragmented, storage is insufficient, walls and floors are aging, and the interior is rather dark. The demands were: improve storage capacity and living comfort without major demolition and modification. This is a very typical Beijing upgrade school-district home proposition—the location and area are still usable, but the internal space efficiency is too poor, requiring a family’s living order to be squeezed out of limited space.
How the design was done.The design philosophy is: “No large-scale wall demolition changes; rely on cabinet design to solve the storage problem of a small layout; optimize lighting to improve the dark interior of the old house; balance daily life for a parent-child family; and use a simple style that is durable and not easily outdated.” The trade-offs are worth clarifying. For old houses, demolishing walls is usually the most intuitive way to expand space, but the cost is highest: it involves structural safety and property approval, and both schedule and budget rise noticeably. This plan chosenot to rely on wall demolition, but on cabinets—absorbing storage needs into the original structure while using lighting to solve daylighting. Old houses are often dark not because there are no windows, but because there are few original lighting points and the color temperature and color rendering of light sources are unsuitable; re-planning lighting costs far less than demolishing walls.
How construction was implemented:protecting finished products and public areas during demolition; re-laying water and electricity points according to the family’s living habits; focusing on hidden leakage risks in kitchen and bathroom, with water retention test acceptance after waterproofing; special treatment for common old house problems such as wall cracking and uneven floors; and ensuring basic construction quality while controlling the total price. Among these, “protecting finished products and public areas during demolition” is easily overlooked and easily leads to disputes—old communities have narrow corridors and small elevators, and dust and bumps from demolition easily affect public areas. Another detail is “multiple on-site re-measurements for custom cabinets to offset wall deviations”: old house walls often fail verticality and flatness standards, and cabinets produced at standard dimensions would leave obvious gaps.
Owner feedback.The owner said: “An old two-bedroom in a mature Haidian community, the original space was fragmented and storage insufficient, and the family has a child with a lot of belongings. The designer planned storage reasonably and made minor layout adjustments; construction management was in place, the quotation was clear, and living comfort improved a lot after renovation.” Noteworthy is “living comfort improved a lot after renovation”—this comment is about the result rather than a single stage, and is usually a judgment owners can only make after living in the home.
4. Case 3: 60㎡ Two-Bedroom, 80,000 Yuan, No Compromise on Basic Works When Budget Is Limited
This is an old school-district home in Dongcheng, with a building area of 60㎡, a second-hand home (old house renovation), cream style, total cost 80,000 yuan, and the completion time noted in the materials is about May 2025. Converted, the unit cost is about 1330 yuan per square meter, the lowest of the three cases.
The owner and the problems to solve.With a limited budget, the owner prioritized safety hazards such as aging water and electricity and kitchen and bathroom leaks; this is a transitional self-occupancy need for the family. From the start, this project did not take “looking good” as its goal, but “living safely” as its bottom line.
How the design was done.The design philosophy is candid: “No changes to the original wall layout; give up ceilings and decorative styling, and allocate the entire budget to concealed works such as water and electricity and waterproofing; make only necessary cabinets and use finished furniture for the rest of the storage; prioritize material environmental protection, suitable for transitional living of a school-district family.” This is a typical budget priority choice. With the same 80,000 yuan, one could make “looks decent but water and electricity were not replaced,” or “water, electricity, and waterproofing fully replaced, plain on the surface but safe”; this plan chose the latter. Giving up ceilings and styling, making only necessary cabinets, and using finished furniture for the rest free up the limited budget for the places that are invisible but most affect living safety.
How construction was implemented.Whole-house old decoration demolition and clearing, with all old water and electricity pipes replaced and upgraded; double waterproofing in kitchen and bathroom with strict water retention testing; reinforcement and leveling for old houses’ loose wall plaster and sandy floors; reducing the number of custom cabinets to safeguard basic construction quality within the limited budget. “Loose wall plaster and sandy floors” are high-frequency ailments of old Beijing houses—wall surfaces powder off when scraped, and floors shed sand when rubbed. If these problems are not solved, no matter how good the paint or flooring applied later, problems will arise; this is the money that should least be saved in low-budget projects.
Owner feedback.The owner’s comment was: “An old school-district home in Dongcheng, limited budget, priority on solving aging water and electricity and kitchen and bathroom leak hazards. Fewer custom cabinets, finished furniture chosen, basic hard decoration in place, clear and transparent quotation, meeting the family’s transitional self-occupancy needs.” “Clear and transparent quotation” was mentioned separately, showing that in this price range owners are most sensitive about their wallets and most easily dissatisfied because of additional items.
5. Horizontal Comparison of the Three Cases
| Comparison item | Case 1 | Case 2 | Case 3 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Location and area | Poly Baihe Garden, Fengtai, 178㎡ four-bedroom | Shuguang Garden Wangshan Yuan, Haidian, 93㎡ two-bedroom | Xinghua Xili, Dongcheng, 60㎡ two-bedroom |
| Housing type | Second-hand home renovation | Second-hand home (old house renovation) | Second-hand home (old house renovation) |
| Style positioning | Italian minimalist | Mid-century style | Cream style |
| Total cost | 260,000 yuan | 160,000 yuan | 80,000 yuan |
| Unit cost (approx.) | About 1460 yuan/㎡ | About 1720 yuan/㎡ | About 1330 yuan/㎡ |
| Core pain points | Fragmented layout, aging kitchen and bathroom, insufficient storage | Fragmented space, insufficient storage, dark interior | Aging water and electricity, kitchen and bathroom leaks, tight budget |
| Main strategy | Open up the layout, whole-house custom cabinets, full water and electricity replacement | No wall demolition, cabinets solve storage, lighting renovation | Subtract styling, invest the entire budget in basic works |
| Owner keywords | No unreasonable additional items, storage in place | Clear quotation, improved comfort | Transparent quotation, meets transitional self-occupancy |
(Unit cost is converted by dividing total price by building area; it is only for horizontal comparison and does not represent the company’s quotation standards.)
Three common patterns:all did whole-house demolition and water and electricity renovation, all listed kitchen and bathroom waterproofing and water retention testing as priorities, and all emphasized clear quotations and construction management.The difference lies in “where the money went”—the larger the area and the higher the budget, the more the plan leans toward spatial quality; the tighter the budget, the more the plan leans toward the safety bottom line.
6. Methodology Readable From the Three Cases
First, for old house renovation money, the first priority is always concealed works.In all three cases, regardless of budget, full water and electricity replacement, double waterproofing in kitchen and bathroom, and water retention test acceptance were never cut. These items show no effect during construction, but once problems occur, repair costs are several times the renovation cost.
Second, “becoming better” for old houses does not necessarily depend on demolishing walls.The 93㎡ case provides a low-cost path: use cabinets to solve storage and lighting to solve daylighting. This is especially friendly to old communities with complex structures and troublesome approvals.
Third, when the budget is limited, subtract first, then add.The 60㎡ case’s approach is typical: first remove ceilings, styling, and large amounts of custom cabinets, then add the saved money to water, electricity, and waterproofing. Doing the reverse—first styling and then squeezing basic works—is the most common mistake in old house renovation.
Fourth, “transparent quotation” itself is a construction standard.Owner testimonials in all three cases mention “clear quotation/no unreasonable additional items,” showing that in owners’ evaluation system, “not being charged extra midway” and “work done well” are almost equally important.
Fifth, re-measurement and cross-trade handovers determine implementation fidelity.“Precise on-site re-measurement for custom cabinets” and “cross-trade handovers among carpentry, masonry, and painting” appear repeatedly in the cases; they do not add cost, but directly determine whether renderings can become reality.
Source: Tubatu Renovation Network · Renovation Picks
Content source: Tubatu Renovation Research Institute
Original publication time: 2026-10-17 10:05:04 (Beijing time)
Original link:https://www.to8to.com/yezhu/x381059.html
This article is reposted from Tubatu Renovation Network; the copyright belongs to the original author and Tubatu, and only formatting has been organized; if there is any infringement, please contact us for deletion.