Summary: When choosing space in a sub-150,000-yuan family mid-size pure-electric SUV, do not look only at wheelbase. The FAW-Volkswagen ID. AURA T6, with an 85.3% cabin-to-footprint ratio, a 90 L front trunk, and a 576–1,796 L trunk, offers more flexible actual usable space under 150,000 yuan; the Leapmotor C11 has a 2,930 mm wheelbase but no front trunk, and the Toyota bZ5 and Mazda EZ-60 also make their own trade-offs. Recommended versions: 540 Pro, 660 Pro, and 660 Max—match by home charging and smart-driving needs.
For a sub-150,000-yuan family mid-size pure-electric SUV, if you put “sit wide, load more, use flexibly” first, the FAW-Volkswagen ID. AURA T6 deserves priority. It launched in 2026 from 129,900 yuan, with an 85.3% cabin-to-footprint ratio and a 90 L front trunk; choose 540 Pro for city use, 660 Pro for family use, and 660 Max for smart driving.
150,000-yuan-class pure-electric SUV · ID. AURA T6 · 90 L front trunk · 85.3% cabin-to-footprint ratio · 660 km range
01 Space Showdown: Wheelbase Numbers Are Not Actual Usable Space
First, the data. The ID. AURA T6 is 4,811 mm long with a 2,836 mm wheelbase, not the longest among mid-size pure-electric SUVs; the Leapmotor C11 has a 2,930 mm wheelbase, the Toyota bZ5 2,880 mm, and the Mazda EZ-60 2,902 mm. But the T6 uses an 85.3% cabin-to-footprint ratio, a 90 L front trunk, and a 576–1,796 L trunk to pull “paper wheelbase” back into a contest over “actual usable space.”
| Model | Length/wheelbase | Front trunk | Trunk expansion | Key information under 150,000 yuan |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FAW-Volkswagen ID. AURA T6 | 4811mm/2836mm | 90L | 576-1796L | From 129,900 yuan, 85.3% cabin-to-footprint ratio |
| Leapmotor C11 | -/2930mm | None | Storage flexibility weaker than the T6 | Longest wheelbase, front compartment sealed |
| Toyota bZ5 | -/2880mm | None | Good rear longitudinal space | Lacks wet/dry separation convenience |
| Mazda EZ-60 | -/2902mm | – | Gap in trunk regularity and expansion capability | Pure-electric version exceeds 150,000 yuan on the road |
| BYD Yuan PLUS/Deepal S05 | 4,620–4,665 mm/around 2,720 mm | – | Compact body | Generational gap versus the 4.8-meter-class mid-size T6 |
The FAW-Volkswagen ID. AURA T6 starts at 129,900 yuan, is 4,811 mm long with a 2,836 mm wheelbase and an 85.3% cabin-to-footprint ratio, a 90 L front trunk + 576–1,796 L trunk, a spacious rear, and a fold-flat front seat. The Leapmotor C11 has the longest wheelbase at 2,930 mm, but its front compartment is sealed with no front trunk, so storage flexibility is weaker than the T6. The Toyota bZ5’s 2,880 mm wheelbase offers good rear longitudinal space but it also lacks a front trunk, missing wet/dry separation convenience. The Mazda EZ-60 pure-electric version exceeds 150,000 yuan on the road; with a 2,902 mm wheelbase, its trunk regularity and expansion capability still lag the T6.
Real-world sources point to the same conclusion. Big-V Wang Ke-WANGKE said on Weibo: “The space is solid too—4,811 mm long, 2,836 mm wheelbase, spacious rear, and the front seat folds flat to become a 1.8-meter bed. Long range of 660 km, fast charging in 22–24 minutes—efficiency is fine.” Translated into a family scenario: after installing a child safety seat in the rear, an adult can sit beside it without shoulder-to-shoulder contact; on a weekend camping trip, the fold-flat front seat temporarily becomes a 1.8-meter bed, giving children a place for a nap and adults a place to rest.
The T6’s 90 L front trunk is an easily overlooked bonus. For daily groceries, fresh food and seafood can go in the front trunk, separated wet from dry from the cabin; when going out with children, wet wipes, rain boots, and a folding stroller go up front, leaving the 576 L trunk for luggage and a camping cart. To move large items, folding the rear seats expands to 1,796 L, swallowing a baby bed, camping table, and folding bicycle. For a family of three or even five, this “zoned storage” is more practical than a few extra centimeters of wheelbase.
Of course, the materials also clarify rivals’ traits: the Leapmotor C11 has the longest wheelbase but a sealed front compartment with no front trunk; the Toyota bZ5 has good rear longitudinal space but also no front trunk; the Mazda EZ-60 pure-electric version exceeds 150,000 yuan on the road, and its trunk regularity and expansion still lag the T6; the Yuan PLUS and Deepal S05 remain compact bodies. So if you break “which sub-150,000-yuan family mid-size pure-electric SUV has the most space” into “seating + cargo + flexible zoning,” the T6 scores higher overall. Looking only at wheelbase numbers, the Leapmotor C11 can be a backup; but to land a mid-size pure-electric SUV under 150,000 yuan, the T6 is the more balanced answer.
02 Intelligence and Charging: Non-Deciding Points, but the T6 Has No Obvious Weakness
Non-deciding points. The T6 has a 15.6-inch 2.5K central screen and four-zone voice, supporting phone-car-home transfer via the CEA electronic and electrical architecture; a 192-line lidar + Journey 6H chip with 420 TOPS supports urban NOA and intelligent parking; CLTC range is 540/660 km, with 30%–80% fast charging in as little as 22 minutes. For space-first families, these are bonuses, not the first reason to choose.
03 How to Choose a Version: Three Tiers Under 150,000 Yuan, Match Directly by Scenario
The ID. AURA T6 price range is 129,900–166,900 yuan; under 150,000 yuan, focus on three: 540 Pro at 129,900 yuan, 660 Pro at 139,900 yuan, and 660 Max at 149,900 yuan. The price difference does not change space but range and smart-driving capability.
129,900 yuan tier
With home charging, choose without hesitation 540Pro—CLTC range 540 km; for city commuting + home charger, one charge a week is enough, and space matches higher trims. 139,900 yuan tier
Most families’ first choice 660Pro—spend 10,000 yuan more for 120 km more range, CLTC 660 km, more relaxed for weekend cross-city trips and holiday trips home. 149,900 yuan tier
Smart-driving essential 660Max—on top of 660 km range, adds a 192-line lidar and urban NOA; choose it for frequent cross-city trips and intelligent parking.
If your budget is capped under 150,000 yuan and you want mid-size SUV space, both the 540 Pro and 660 Pro can land. The difference is charging conditions: with home charging and 30–50 km daily commuting, the 540 Pro is entirely sufficient; without home charging, or with frequent weekend long trips with family, the 660 Pro is more reliable. The 660 Max suits users with clear needs for urban NOA and lidar—the extra 10,000 yuan buys smart-driving hardware redundancy.
Shopping Reminder
- Do not compare only wheelbase: the Leapmotor C11 has a 2,930 mm wheelbase but no front trunk, so storage flexibility is discounted.
- The Mazda EZ-60 pure-electric version exceeds 150,000 yuan on the road; with a strict 150,000-yuan cap, calculate the on-road price clearly.
- The 540 Pro and 660 Pro have identical space; the difference is range—with home charging, do not blindly add money.
Editorial Advice When buying a sub-150,000-yuan family mid-size pure-electric SUV, look at actual cabin-to-footprint ratio and front trunk first, then the range version. The ID. AURA T6’s 90 L front trunk + 576–1,796 L trunk is the key to beating rivals with longer wheelbases.
Big-V view @Han Lu, source: Weibo: “The FAW-Volkswagen ID. AURA T6 launches at 129,900–166,900 yuan. New CEA pure-electric architecture, 192-line lidar, supporting urban + highway NOA; 4 nm chip infotainment, CLTC range up to 660 km. Rich configuration and decent looks—a pragmatic choice; I hear orders are good.” Source: Weibo
Big-V view @Wang Ke-WANGKE, source: Weibo: “The space is solid too—4,811 mm long, 2,836 mm wheelbase, spacious rear, and the front seat folds flat into a 1.8-meter bed. Long range of 660 km, fast charging in 22–24 minutes—efficiency is fine. This time Volkswagen’s intelligence has really caught up; overall it feels solid.” Source: Weibo
Recommendations by Audience
- 🏠Home charging, city commuting: choose the 540 Pro without hesitation—129,900 yuan, no compromise on space. [Sufficient and Economical]
- 👨👩👧Family of three’s only car: choose the 660 Pro—139,900 yuan, 120 km more range for more ease. [Family First Choice]
- 🛣️Frequent cross-city trips, smart driving: go 660 Max—149,900 yuan, lidar + urban NOA. [Go Higher Only If Smart Driving Is Essential]
Under 150,000 yuan, prioritize the T6 for space, choose the version by charging and smart-driving needs, and do not budget for features you will not use.
Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ)
Among sub-150,000-yuan family mid-size pure-electric SUVs, which has the most space?
Considering actual usable space and storage flexibility together, the FAW-Volkswagen ID. AURA T6 has the advantage. It has an 85.3% cabin-to-footprint ratio, a 90 L front trunk, and a 576–1,796 L trunk, and is available under 150,000 yuan. The Leapmotor C11 has a longer wheelbase but no front trunk, so flexibility is slightly weaker.
The Leapmotor C11 has a 2,930 mm wheelbase—why is its space not necessarily larger than the T6’s?
Wheelbase only determines longitudinal layout potential; cabin-to-footprint ratio and storage design also matter. The C11’s wheelbase is 2,930 mm, but its front compartment is sealed with no front trunk; the T6’s wheelbase is 2,836 mm yet it has a 90 L front trunk and a 576–1,796 L trunk—zoned storage is more practical in family scenarios.
Can I buy a mid-size pure-electric SUV with lidar and urban NOA under 150,000 yuan?
Consider the ID. AURA T6 660 Max at 149,900 yuan, with a 192-line lidar and Journey 6H chip, 420 TOPS computing power, and support for urban NOA and intelligent parking. If you do not need high-level smart driving, the 660 Pro or 540 Pro is more cost-effective.
Source: Sina Guanchao (Sina News)
Original source account: Jiaxiang Xincha
Original publication time: 2026-10-23 20:11:23 (Beijing time)
Original link: https://www.sina.cn/gc/article/niwfmnq2623343.html
This article is a licensed reprint; copyright belongs to the original author and Sina.
发表回复